The Ultimate Race between NestJs vs Express JS
When it comes to backend development in Node.js, two major frameworks stand out: ExpressJS and NestJS. Both are popular, but which one should you use? Let’s break it down in a simple and easy way.
1. What are ExpressJS and NestJS?
ExpressJS:
- A minimal and flexible Node.js web framework.
- Helps in building APIs and web applications quickly.
- Very lightweight with fewer built-in features.
NestJS:
- A full-fledged Node.js framework built on ExpressJS (by default).
- Uses TypeScript and follows an Angular-like structure.
- Provides dependency injection, decorators, and modular architecture.
2. Core Differences Between NestJS and ExpressJS
| Feature | ExpressJS | NestJS |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Micro-framework | Full-fledged framework |
| Architecture | Unstructured | Modular & scalable |
| Built-in Features | Minimal | Dependency Injection, Middleware, Guards, Pipes, etc. |
| Performance | Faster for small apps | Better for large-scale apps |
| Learning Curve | Easier for beginners | Steeper, but scalable |
| TypeScript Support | Optional | Built-in |
| Best For | Small apps, quick APIs | Large apps, enterprise applications |
| Community Support | Large | Growing rapidly |
3. How Easy is it to Start?
ExpressJS: Getting Started
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
res.send('Hello, ExpressJS!');
});
app.listen(3000, () => {
console.log('Server is running on port 3000');
});
✅ Very simple, minimal setup.
NestJS: Getting Started
import { Controller, Get } from '@nestjs/common';
import { NestFactory } from '@nestjs/core';
import { Module } from '@nestjs/common';
@Controller()
class AppController {
@Get()
getHello(): string {
return 'Hello, NestJS!';
}
}
@Module({
controllers: [AppController],
})
class AppModule {}
async function bootstrap() {
const app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule);
await app.listen(3000);
console.log('Server is running on port 3000');
}
bootstrap();
✅ More structured, requires understanding modules and decorators.
4. Performance & Speed Comparison
| Scenario | ExpressJS | NestJS |
|---|---|---|
| Simple API Request (Hello World) | Slightly faster | Slightly slower (because of extra layers) |
| Large-Scale Application | Hard to maintain | Better structured & scalable |
| Real-World Performance | Fast for small apps | Efficient for enterprise apps |
| Memory Usage | Lower | Slightly higher due to additional features |
💡 ExpressJS is faster for small apps, but NestJS is better for maintainability in large apps.
5. Real-Life Use Cases
When to Choose ExpressJS?
- If you need a quick and lightweight API.
- When working on small to medium-scale applications.
- If you prefer a JavaScript-first approach.
When to Choose NestJS?
- When building enterprise-grade applications.
- If you need better scalability and maintainability.
- If you prefer a TypeScript-first approach.
- When working on microservices or monolithic architectures.
6. Middleware & Extensibility
ExpressJS Middleware
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.use((req, res, next) => {
console.log('Middleware executed');
next();
});
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
res.send('Hello, Middleware!');
});
app.listen(3000);
✅ Simple middleware integration.
NestJS Middleware
import { Injectable, NestMiddleware } from '@nestjs/common';
import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express';
@Injectable()
class LoggerMiddleware implements NestMiddleware {
use(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) {
console.log('Middleware executed');
next();
}
}
✅ More structured middleware integration.
7. Error Handling
ExpressJS Error Handling
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
console.error(err.stack);
res.status(500).send('Something broke!');
});
NestJS Error Handling
import { ExceptionFilter, Catch, ArgumentsHost, HttpException } from '@nestjs/common';
@Catch(HttpException)
class HttpErrorFilter implements ExceptionFilter {
catch(exception: HttpException, host: ArgumentsHost) {
console.log('Error:', exception.message);
}
}
✅ NestJS provides a more structured way to handle errors.
8. Testing
| Feature | ExpressJS | NestJS |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | Manual setup | Built-in support with Jest |
| Integration Testing | Need extra libraries | Built-in tools available |
| E2E Testing | Uses third-party tools | Comes with testing utilities |
9. Final Verdict
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Ease of Learning | ExpressJS |
| Performance (Small Apps) | ExpressJS |
| Scalability (Large Apps) | NestJS |
| Best for Enterprise Apps | NestJS |
| Best for Quick APIs | ExpressJS |
| Built-in Features | NestJS |
🔹 Use ExpressJS for small, fast applications. 🔹 Use NestJS for large, structured, scalable apps.
10. Conclusion
If you are working on a small API or a quick project, go with ExpressJS. It’s simple and fast. But if you are planning for enterprise-level applications, microservices, or better architecture, NestJS is the best choice.
🚀 NestJS is like an advanced version of ExpressJS with better structure, scalability, and TypeScript support.
Hope this comparison helps! Happy coding! 🎯
Thank you for reading 😁